Dave Winer says we go to war because it is profitable. Take a look at Halliburton's 5 year chart and draw your own conclusions:
« Land Value | Main | Plaxo and OpenID »
July 18, 2007
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
July 2009
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Recent Posts
- Google Apps SSO and Authentication – Twitter Breach Creates Teachable Moment
- Everything into the browser
- Identity for On Demand and SaaS
- Bailing Out - the Hoard Trade
- Choose Your Own Reality
- Salesforce.com and SAML for SSO
- Identity and the Cloud – more detail
- Identity and the Cloud – bullet list
- Contrasting Views of the Internet
- Great Advice
Correlation does not necessary imply causation.
Posted by: Jay Goodman Tamboli | July 18, 2007 at 12:15 PM
I agree with the first commenter. Please do not attempt to mislead us.
Posted by: Charlie | July 18, 2007 at 01:58 PM
I grew up in a comfortable middle class home as a result of my fathers career in the military-industrial complex.
So I would ask - Does your paycheck depend on denial of reality ?
Posted by: RB | July 18, 2007 at 07:14 PM
Correlation does not necessarily imply causation, nor does "draw your own conclusions".
However in this particular case, there is unambiguous evidence [1] for a direct connection between the invasion of Iraq and the fortunes of Haliburton (and hence Cheney & co.).
[1] http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/about_hal/since2001.html
Posted by: Danny | July 19, 2007 at 01:04 AM
Q: What is the quickest way to get public money into private hands?
A: I'll tell you, war. War is profitable, but only to those with private hands.
Posted by: Jeremy | August 01, 2007 at 08:13 PM
We don't go to war for profit, there are other reasons. I don't know like Pearl Harbor or the World Trade Center and sometimes there are little sidebar actions like the Phillapines, Guam, or Iraq to not only strengthen our implacement but to keep the enemy from being all over our back. But to stay at war is very profitable for everybody who makes the smallest bolt for the most insignificant piece of equipment to the stealthiest aircraft, and designers of new and upcoming equipment. Not just Halliburton!
Posted by: Vik Thomas | April 25, 2008 at 05:33 AM
I stumbled across this forum the other day and thought i would post it here.
If you are looking for quality dofollow backlinks, then http://dofollowforum.com has a load of free Blog Lists for you to download.
Just register at http://dofollowforum.com
thanks
Jack Smith
Posted by: dofollow | December 31, 2009 at 03:51 AM